2023
From logotype to Design System: drawing the heritage out
Translating a B2B brand's strategic shift into a complete visual system, carried from digital through to industrial design, and crystallized in a brand book of its own.
Bollé Safety needed to distinguish itself from Bollé Sport to support its international growth, in the United States above all. The difficulty was not finding a mark: it was finding one in a setup where nobody had the authority to impose it. Two separate entities within the same group, the same name, the same heritage, two independent management teams, and a single point of strategic convergence, the Board.
Bollé Safety X InSign
Creative Manager - Art Direction
Brand foundations
A differentiation that could not be decreed
When Bollé Sport introduced a red "B" as its distinguishing mark, the most immediate response would have been a symmetrical one: give Safety an equivalent mark, equally new, equally arbitrary.
That route had a fatal flaw. Two recent, competing marks placed on the same name would have produced a territorial fight with no referee, each brand claiming the same legitimacy on the same grounds. In a governance where the two management teams are independent, a differentiation that rests on a balance of power never settles.
Looking to the past for what the present could not settle
It seemed to me more solid to move the debate onto ground nobody could contest: the shared heritage itself. The founders were known as "Les Rois des Lunettes", the Kings of Eyewear, and that historical marking still existed, discreetly engraved on the temple of certified frames as a token of technical reassurance.
Bringing the crown back was therefore not a matter of inventing a mark but of reactivating a dormant asset. The argument becomes hard to argue with, because it claims to take nothing away from anyone: it exhumes. And for a protection brand it carries a promise that reads directly, that of the highest level of exigence.
This choice did not impose itself all at once, nor through a single decision. I had started introducing it project after project, among them the BSSI identity designed the year before, where the crown had become the heart of a crest. The rebranding formalized what several initiatives had already put in place.
From risk to performance
The second shift was about register. Eye protection is traditionally sold on risk and on the accident avoided, a discourse that puts the wearer in the position of potential victim and the equipment in that of a constraint to endure.
The position we took inverts that relationship: make the product a catalyst for performance rather than a shield, and safety a mindset rather than an obligation. The line "See all you can" condenses that shift, and the whole brand vocabulary follows from it.
This pivot was not born with the rebranding. The Platinum campaign, a year earlier, had been its pilot project, and buy-in there had been uneven from one region to the next. What the rebranding brought is not the idea but its status: what had been a direction defended project by project became the brand's official position.
Building a culture before being able to rebuild the brand
A rebranding presupposes a capacity to produce, and that capacity did not exist at the start.
Bollé Safety had accelerated its growth and was stating high international ambitions, but had never had a specialist dedicated to art direction, nor even an in-house graphic designer. The brand knew how to outsource its production, without having the consistency or the process needed to run creative projects internally. Reactivating a heritage and setting creative directions therefore required a prerequisite that has nothing creative about it: installing a culture of in-house production, methods, and the habit of deciding upstream rather than ordering downstream.
That is what made this work long, and it is a different thing from a failure. The rebranding brought everything into focus: it validated as much as it anchored groundwork carried out until then without an explicit mandate. An organization discovering the creative function at the same time as it rebuilds its brand necessarily moves at two speeds.
What InSign brought
InSign was briefed jointly with the Marketing department, and produced the positioning proposals as well as the work on voice and tone. Its real contribution was less to invent than to structure: to give overall coherence and formal authority to directions already under way, and to articulate them into a strategy that holds end to end.
I put it that way because it is accurate, and because the nuance matters to anyone reading a case study. An agency that consolidates is not an agency that replaces, and a successful rebranding often looks less like a break than like the fair copy of a movement already begun.
InSign also carried the segmentation by market, signed off by management. Its visual translation was to run through a strict color code applied to typography and to solid areas; I proposed moving it onto the color grading of the key visuals instead, and that counter-proposal was followed. The detail appears in the related project study.
What this strategy never had to settle
One point is worth noting for what it says about the context rather than about the work. Coordination with Bollé Sport being a matter for the Board alone, Safety's identity strategy was built without any direct negotiation with the other brand.
That simplified execution and left open a question neither camp had a mandate to handle: that of the group's overall coherence. An identity can be right at the scale of a brand and remain incomplete at the scale of its shareholder.
Related projects